vs
4.7Battery6.1
Why is EH11 FIO-EH11 better than WH-CH530?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · WH-CH530: No
- Weight92 g vs 150 g+63%
- LDACYes · WH-CH530: No
- Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
- Driver size40 mm vs 30 mm+33%
Why is WH-CH530 better than EH11 FIO-EH11?
- Battery life30 h vs 55 h+83%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Ear cup design | Semi-open | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 30 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 17 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 30 h | 55 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, SBC | LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 92 g | 150 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
