9.2Battery6.1
Why is TUNE 530BT better than WH-CH530?
- Battery life76 h vs 55 h+38%
- Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
- Driver size33 mm vs 30 mm+10%
Why is WH-CH530 better than TUNE 530BT?
WH-CH530 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 33 mm | 30 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 30 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 102 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 76 h | 55 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LC3, AAC, SBC | LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 152 g | 150 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
