How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Style 3 Bluetooth vs Century TAH2000

Energy Sistem Style 3 Bluetooth vs Philips Century TAH2000

What Style 3 Bluetooth does better (0) and where Century TAH2000 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Energy Sistem Style 3 Bluetooth
Energy Sistem · 2022Style 3 Bluetooth
4.0Score
0 advantages≈ $10
Higher score
vs
Philips Century TAH2000
Philips · 2025Century TAH2000
2 advantages≈ $19
3.9Battery4.0

Why is Style 3 Bluetooth better than Century TAH2000?

Style 3 Bluetooth has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Century TAH2000 better than Style 3 Bluetooth?

  1. Battery life25 h vs 26 h+4%
  2. Bluetooth version5.1 vs 5.4+6%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-ear—
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—123 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNo—
Battery & charging
Battery life25 h26 h
Battery capacity400 mAh—
Charging time2 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.15.4
Bluetooth codecsSBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Design & build
Weight—80 g
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare