5.4Battery3.0
Why is Air better than TAST702BK/98?
- Battery life7 h vs 6 h+17%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx5+40%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
Why is TAST702BK/98 better than Air?
TAST702BK/98 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver size | — | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 94 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Microphones | 4 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 6 h |
| Total with charging case | 35 h | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.3 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
