2.2Battery3.2
Why is TRUE GO SLIM better than TAST702BK/98?
- Driver size13 mm vs 6 mm2.2×
Why is TAST702BK/98 better than TRUE GO SLIM?
- Battery life4.5 h vs 6 h+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Semi-in-ear (open) | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver size | 13 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 25 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 108 dB | 94 dB |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 4.5 h | 6 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 42 g | — |
| Protection rating | — | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
