How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. earU ER-100PT vs EAH-AZ100

Casio earU ER-100PT vs Technics EAH-AZ100

What earU ER-100PT does better (3) and where EAH-AZ100 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Casio earU ER-100PT
Casio · 2026earU ER-100PT
7.9Score
3 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics · 2025EAH-AZ100
6.5Score
3 advantages≈ $280
9.7Battery5.6
2.6Build & features3.8

Why is earU ER-100PT better than EAH-AZ100?

  1. Battery life14 h vs 8 h+75%
  2. aptXYes · EAH-AZ100: No
  3. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%

Why is EAH-AZ100 better than earU ER-100PT?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · earU ER-100PT: Yes
  2. LDACNo · earU ER-100PT: Yes
  3. Earbud weight (each)8 g vs 5.9 g+36%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOpen-earIn-ear
Ear cup designOpen-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm10 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—40,000 Hz
Dolby Atmos—Yes
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—Yes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life14 h8 h
Battery life with ANC—7 h
Total with charging case—29 h
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Wireless charging (case)—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsaptX, AAC, SBCLDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXYesNo
LDACNoYes
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)8 g5.9 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare