vs
Why is earU ER-100PT better than Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer?
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5+8%
Why is Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer better than earU ER-100PT?
- Battery life14 h vs 30 h2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 10 mm | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 14 h | 30 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 8 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | — | Grey, White |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Kenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100TvsCasio earU ER-100PT8.07.8
vsSennheiser MOMENTUM True Wireless 5vsCasio earU ER-100PT7.77.8vs
Casio earU ER-100PTvsSoundcore R50i NC
vsCambridge Audio Melomania A100vsCasio earU ER-100PT7.97.8
vs
Apple AirPods 5vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer
vsHuawei FreeClip 2vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer