vs
9.7Battery9.3
2.6Build & features3.3
Why is earU ER-100PT better than GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100T?
- aptXYes · GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100T: No
Why is GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100T better than earU ER-100PT?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · earU ER-100PT: Yes
- Battery life14 h vs 14.5 h+4%
- LDACNo · earU ER-100PT: Yes
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
- Earbud weight (each)8 g vs 6.7 g+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | MEMS |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 14 h | 14.5 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 8 g | 6.7 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds4 ProvsCasio earU ER-100PT8.47.9
vsSennheiser MOMENTUM True Wireless 5vsCasio earU ER-100PT7.77.9vs
Casio earU ER-100PTvsCasio earU ER-100SH-WY7.97.9
vsCambridge Audio Melomania A100vsCasio earU ER-100PT7.87.9
vsKenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100TvsSamsung Galaxy Buds4 Pro8.08.4vsKenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100TvsSennheiser MOMENTUM True Wireless 58.07.7