vs
9.6Battery8.8
Why is earU ER-100PT better than TV Clear?
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 4.2+29%
- aptXYes · TV Clear: No
- Driver size10 mm vs 6 mm+67%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
Why is TV Clear better than earU ER-100PT?
- Battery life14 h vs 15 h+7%
- Earbud weight (each)8 g vs 6.9 g+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 14 h | 15 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 4.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 8 g | 6.9 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Kenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100TvsCasio earU ER-100PT8.07.8
vsSennheiser MOMENTUM True Wireless 5vsCasio earU ER-100PT7.77.8vs
Casio earU ER-100PTvsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörervs
Casio earU ER-100PTvsSoundcore R50i NC
vsCambridge Audio Melomania A100vsCasio earU ER-100PT7.97.8
vs
Technics EAH-AZ80vsSennheiser TV Clear