vs
Why is earU ER-100PT better than TWS STAX S10 ANC planar?
- aptXYes · TWS STAX S10 ANC planar: No
Why is TWS STAX S10 ANC planar better than earU ER-100PT?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · earU ER-100PT: Yes
- LDACNo · earU ER-100PT: Yes
- Driver size10 mm vs 12 mm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Planar magnetic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 40,000 Hz |
| Sensitivity | — | 92 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 14 h | — |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 18 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | LDAC, LHDC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 8 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Kenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100TvsCasio earU ER-100PT8.07.8
vs
Sennheiser MOMENTUM True Wireless 5vsCasio earU ER-100PT7.77.8
vs
Casio earU ER-100PTvsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer
vs
Casio earU ER-100PTvsSoundcore R50i NC
vs
Cambridge Audio Melomania A100vsCasio earU ER-100PT7.97.8
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100vsEdifier TWS STAX S10 ANC planar
