How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. QuietComfort Ultra Headphones (2nd Gen) vs Aviator 900 ANC

Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones (2nd Gen) vs Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC

What QuietComfort Ultra Headphones (2nd Gen) does better (3) and where Aviator 900 ANC wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones (2nd Gen)
7.2Score
3 advantages≈ $270
Higher score
vs
Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC
Skullcandy · 2025Aviator 900 ANC
6.9Score
1 advantage≈ $320
7.8Noise control & calls6.8
5.2Battery7.4
8.2Connectivity4.8

Why is QuietComfort Ultra Headphones (2nd Gen) better than Aviator 900 ANC?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Aviator 900 ANC: No
  2. Weight264 g vs 332 g+26%
  3. aptXYes · Aviator 900 ANC: No

Why is Aviator 900 ANC better than QuietComfort Ultra Headphones (2nd Gen)?

  1. Battery life45 h vs 60 h+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size—40 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—36 Ω
Sensitivity—119 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYesYes
Head tracking—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANC—Yes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones—6
Battery & charging
Battery life45 h60 h
Battery life with ANC—50 h
Charging time3 h—
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 4 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsaptX Adaptive, SBCLC3
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXYesNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYesYes
Design & build
Weight264 g332 g
FoldableYesYes
Colours—True Black, Tortoise
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Wear detection (auto pause)—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare