How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Aventho 300 vs Monitor III ANC

beyerdynamic Aventho 300 vs Marshall Monitor III ANC

What Aventho 300 does better (6) and where Monitor III ANC wins (3) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic Aventho 300
beyerdynamic · 2024Aventho 300
8.3Score
6 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
Marshall Monitor III ANC
Marshall · 2024Monitor III ANC
7.1Score
3 advantages≈ $270
6.4Noise control & calls7.8
6.8Battery8.2

Why is Aventho 300 better than Monitor III ANC?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Monitor III ANC: No
  2. Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
  3. aptXYes · Monitor III ANC: No
  4. Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
  5. Driver size45 mm vs 32 mm+41%
  6. Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+10%

Why is Monitor III ANC better than Aventho 300?

  1. Battery life50 h vs 100 h2×
  2. Battery life with ANC50 h vs 70 h+40%
  3. Weight319 g vs 250 g+28%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size45 mm32 mm
Lowest frequency5 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency22,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—46 Ω
Sensitivity—92 dB
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life50 h100 h
Battery life with ANC50 h70 h
Charging time2 h3 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Wireless charging (case)—No
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsaptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AACAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXYesNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight319 g250 g
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx0
FoldableYesYes
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare