How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Aventho 300 vs MONITOR III A.N.C.

beyerdynamic Aventho 300 vs Marshall MONITOR III A.N.C.

What Aventho 300 does better (6) and where MONITOR III A.N.C. wins (3) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic Aventho 300
beyerdynamic · 2024Aventho 300
8.3Score
6 advantages≈ $300
vs
Marshall MONITOR III A.N.C.
Marshall · 2024MONITOR III A.N.C.
8.9Score
3 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
6.4Noise control & calls7.8
6.8Battery9.6

Why is Aventho 300 better than MONITOR III A.N.C.?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · MONITOR III A.N.C.: No
  2. Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
  3. aptXYes · MONITOR III A.N.C.: No
  4. Driver size45 mm vs 32 mm+41%
  5. Charging time2 h vs 2.5 h+25%
  6. Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+10%

Why is MONITOR III A.N.C. better than Aventho 300?

  1. Battery life50 h vs 100 h2×
  2. Battery life with ANC50 h vs 70 h+40%
  3. Weight319 g vs 250 g+28%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-ear—
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size45 mm32 mm
Lowest frequency5 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency22,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—35 Ω
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life50 h100 h
Battery life with ANC50 h70 h
Charging time2 h2.5 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsaptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AACLC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXYesNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight319 g250 g
FoldableYesYes
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare