How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Aventho 300 vs Melomania P100

beyerdynamic Aventho 300 vs Cambridge Audio Melomania P100

What Aventho 300 does better (3) and where Melomania P100 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic Aventho 300
beyerdynamic · 2024Aventho 300
8.3Score
3 advantages≈ $300
vs
Cambridge Audio Melomania P100
Cambridge Audio · 2024Melomania P100
9.3Score
2 advantages≈ $250
Higher score
6.4Noise control & calls6.5
6.8Battery9.2

Why is Aventho 300 better than Melomania P100?

  1. Weight319 g vs 330 g+3%
  2. Charging time2 h vs 2.5 h+25%
  3. Driver size45 mm vs 40 mm+12%

Why is Melomania P100 better than Aventho 300?

  1. Battery life50 h vs 100 h2×
  2. Battery life with ANC50 h vs 60 h+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size45 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency5 Hz—
Highest frequency22,000 Hz—
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones—6
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life50 h100 h
Battery life with ANC50 h60 h
Charging time2 h2.5 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsaptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AACaptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXYesYes
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Design & build
Weight319 g330 g
FoldableYes—
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare