How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Aventho 200 vs WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration

beyerdynamic Aventho 200 vs Sony WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration

What Aventho 200 does better (4) and where WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration wins (5) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic Aventho 200
beyerdynamic · 2025Aventho 200
8.5Score
4 advantages≈ $270
Higher score
vs
Sony WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration
5.3Score
5 advantages≈ $270
6.4Noise control & calls6.2
7.5Battery3.7

Why is Aventho 200 better than WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration?

  1. Battery life63 h vs 34 h+85%
  2. Battery life with ANC40 h vs 27 h+48%
  3. aptXYes · WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration: No
  4. Driver size45 mm vs 40 mm+12%

Why is WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration better than Aventho 200?

  1. Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 4 Hz2.5×
  2. LDACNo · Aventho 200: Yes
  3. Weight293 g vs 253 g+16%
  4. Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
  5. Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+82%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size45 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency10 Hz4 Hz
Highest frequency22,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Sensitivity—106 dB
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones—5
Battery & charging
Battery life63 h34 h
Battery life with ANC40 h27 h
Charging time1.5 h—
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.46
Bluetooth codecsaptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBCLDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXYesNo
LDACNoYes
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant
Design & build
Weight293 g253 g
FoldableYesYes
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare