vs
6.4Noise control & calls3.8
Why is Aventho 200 better than 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold?
- Active noise cancellingYes · 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold: No
- Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 15 Hz+50%
- Driver size45 mm vs 40 mm+12%
Why is 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold better than Aventho 200?
- Weight293 g vs 260 g+13%
- Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 25,000 Hz+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 45 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 15 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 22,000 Hz | 25,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 103 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Adaptive ANC | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 63 h | — |
| Battery life with ANC | 40 h | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 293 g | 260 g |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
JBL Tour One M3vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 2007.98.5vs
beyerdynamic Aventho 200vsJBL TOUR ONE M3 SMART TX8.57.9vs
beyerdynamic Aventho 200vsV-MODA M-100 PRO
vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 300vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 2008.38.5
vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra (2nd Gen)vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold
vsSony WH-1000XM6vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold