vs
6.6Noise control & calls3.9
Why is Aventho 200 better than VMH-S100?
- Active noise cancellingYes · VMH-S100: No
- Charging time1.5 h vs 4 h2.7×
Why is VMH-S100 better than Aventho 200?
- Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 5 Hz2×
- Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+82%
- Driver size45 mm vs 50 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 45 mm | 50 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 22,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Adaptive ANC | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 63 h | — |
| Battery life with ANC | 40 h | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 4 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 293 g | — |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
JBL Tour One M3vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 2008.08.4vs
beyerdynamic Aventho 200vsJBL TOUR ONE M3 SMART TX8.48.0vs
beyerdynamic Aventho 200vsV-MODA M-100 PRO
vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 300vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 2008.48.4vs
JBL Tour One M3vsRoland VMH-S100
vsBose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones (2nd Gen)vsRoland VMH-S100