How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Aventho 200 vs Crusher 1080 ANC

beyerdynamic Aventho 200 vs Skullcandy Crusher 1080 ANC

What Aventho 200 does better (5) and where Crusher 1080 ANC wins (1) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic Aventho 200
beyerdynamic · 2025Aventho 200
8.5Score
5 advantages≈ $270
Higher score
vs
Skullcandy Crusher 1080 ANC
Skullcandy · 2026Crusher 1080 ANC
8.0Score
1 advantage≈ $280
6.4Noise control & calls7.8
7.5Battery7.4

Why is Aventho 200 better than Crusher 1080 ANC?

  1. Battery life63 h vs 60 h+5%
  2. Weight293 g vs 374 g+28%
  3. Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 20 Hz2×
  4. Driver size45 mm vs 36 mm+25%
  5. Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+10%

Why is Crusher 1080 ANC better than Aventho 200?

  1. Battery life with ANC40 h vs 50 h+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size45 mm36 mm
Lowest frequency10 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency22,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—36 Ω
Sensitivity—122 dB
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life63 h60 h
Battery life with ANC40 h50 h
Charging time1.5 h—
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 4 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsaptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXYes—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE Audio—Yes
Auracast—Yes
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight293 g374 g
FoldableYes—
Colours—Primer, Candy, Cement, True Black
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare