vs
6.7Noise control & calls4.0
Why is Aventho 200 better than Spark NEO?
- Active noise cancellingYes · Spark NEO: No
- Weight293 g vs 366 g+25%
- Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 20 Hz2×
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5+8%
- Driver size45 mm vs 40 mm+12%
- Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+10%
Why is Spark NEO better than Aventho 200?
Spark NEO has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | — |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 45 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 22,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Adaptive ANC | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 63 h | — |
| Battery life with ANC | 40 h | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 293 g | 366 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black, Gold |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
beyerdynamic Aventho 200vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Goldvs
beyerdynamic Aventho 200vsV-MODA M-100 PRO
vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 300vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 2008.28.3vs
beyerdynamic Aventho 200vsRoland VMH-S100vs
beyerdynamic Aventho 200vsSkullcandy Crusher Plyr 720
vs
JBL Tour One M3vsPositive Grid Spark NEO