How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Aventho 200 vs Monitor III ANC

beyerdynamic Aventho 200 vs Marshall Monitor III ANC

What Aventho 200 does better (6) and where Monitor III ANC wins (3) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic Aventho 200
beyerdynamic · 2025Aventho 200
8.5Score
6 advantages≈ $270
Higher score
vs
Marshall Monitor III ANC
Marshall · 2024Monitor III ANC
7.1Score
3 advantages≈ $270
6.4Noise control & calls7.8
7.5Battery8.2

Why is Aventho 200 better than Monitor III ANC?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Monitor III ANC: No
  2. Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 20 Hz2×
  3. Charging time1.5 h vs 3 h2×
  4. aptXYes · Monitor III ANC: No
  5. Driver size45 mm vs 32 mm+41%
  6. Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+10%

Why is Monitor III ANC better than Aventho 200?

  1. Battery life63 h vs 100 h+59%
  2. Battery life with ANC40 h vs 70 h+75%
  3. Weight293 g vs 250 g+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size45 mm32 mm
Lowest frequency10 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency22,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—46 Ω
Sensitivity—92 dB
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life63 h100 h
Battery life with ANC40 h70 h
Charging time1.5 h3 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Wireless charging (case)—No
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsaptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXYesNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight293 g250 g
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx0
FoldableYesYes
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare