How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Aventho 200 vs Tour One M3

beyerdynamic Aventho 200 vs JBL Tour One M3

What Aventho 200 does better (3) and where Tour One M3 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic Aventho 200
beyerdynamic · 2025Aventho 200
8.5Score
3 advantages≈ $270
Higher score
vs
JBL Tour One M3
JBL · 2025Tour One M3
7.9Score
4 advantages≈ $270
9.2Sound8.3
6.4Noise control & calls6.7
7.5Battery7.6

Why is Aventho 200 better than Tour One M3?

  1. aptXYes · Tour One M3: No
  2. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
  3. Driver size45 mm vs 40 mm+12%

Why is Tour One M3 better than Aventho 200?

  1. Battery life63 h vs 70 h+11%
  2. LDACNo · Aventho 200: Yes
  3. Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+82%
  4. Weight293 g vs 278 g+5%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tour One M3JBL Tour One M3≈ $2707.9
Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size45 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency10 Hz10 Hz
Highest frequency22,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance—18 Ω
Sensitivity—122 dB
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Head tracking—Yes
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones—8
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life63 h70 h
Battery life with ANC40 h40 h
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—5 min → 1 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsaptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBCLDAC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXYesNo
LDACNoYes
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight293 g278 g
FoldableYesYes
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare