vs
6.4Noise control & calls7.8
7.5Battery7.0
Why is Aventho 200 better than OnTrac?
- Battery life63 h vs 55 h+15%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 3 h2×
- Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 21,000 Hz+5%
Why is OnTrac better than Aventho 200?
- Battery life with ANC40 h vs 55 h+38%
- Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 6 Hz+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 45 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 6 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 22,000 Hz | 21,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 63 h | 55 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 40 h | 55 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 3 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 293 g | — |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
JBL Tour One M3vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 2007.98.5vs
beyerdynamic Aventho 200vsJBL TOUR ONE M3 SMART TX8.57.9vs
beyerdynamic Aventho 200vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Goldvs
beyerdynamic Aventho 200vsV-MODA M-100 PRO
vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 300vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 2008.38.5vs
beyerdynamic Aventho 300vsDyson OnTrac8.38.4