vs
6.6Noise control & calls7.9
7.4Battery7.7
Why is Aventho 200 better than MONDO OVER-EAR ANC?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · MONDO OVER-EAR ANC: No
- Battery life63 h vs 55 h+15%
- Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 20 Hz2×
- aptXYes · MONDO OVER-EAR ANC: No
- Weight293 g vs 314 g+7%
- Driver size45 mm vs 40 mm+12%
- Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+10%
Why is MONDO OVER-EAR ANC better than Aventho 200?
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | — |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 45 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 22,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 95 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 63 h | 55 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 40 h | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 293 g | 314 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
JBL Tour One M3vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 2007.88.2vs
beyerdynamic Aventho 200vsV-MODA M-100 PRO
vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 300vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 2008.28.2vs
beyerdynamic Aventho 200vsRoland VMH-S100vs
beyerdynamic Aventho 200vsSkullcandy Crusher Plyr 720
vs
Audio Technica ATH-AL5NCvsdefunc MONDO OVER-EAR ANC9.08.7