vs
6.4Noise control & calls6.7
7.5Battery3.7
Why is Aventho 200 better than Px7 S3?
- Battery life63 h vs 30 h2.1×
- Battery life with ANC40 h vs 30 h+33%
- Weight293 g vs 300 g+2%
- Driver size45 mm vs 40 mm+12%
Why is Px7 S3 better than Aventho 200?
Px7 S3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 45 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 22,000 Hz | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 8 |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 63 h | 30 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 40 h | 30 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 15 min → 7 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC | aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 293 g | 300 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
JBL Tour One M3vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 2007.98.5vs
beyerdynamic Aventho 200vsJBL TOUR ONE M3 SMART TX8.57.9vs
beyerdynamic Aventho 200vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Goldvs
beyerdynamic Aventho 200vsV-MODA M-100 PRO
vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 300vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 2008.38.5
vsBowers & Wilkins Px7 S3vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold