vs
3.8Noise control & calls9.2
2.0Battery2.6
Why is SoundForm Mini 2 Wireless better than HiTune S3 WS209?
- Battery life8 h vs 7 h+14%
- Driver size40 mm vs 12 mm3.3×
Why is HiTune S3 WS209 better than SoundForm Mini 2 Wireless?
- Active noise cancellingNo · SoundForm Mini 2 Wireless: Yes
- Charging time7 h vs 3 h2.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 12 mm |
| Number of drivers | 2 | — |
| Sensitivity | 85 dB | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 7 h |
| Charging time | 7 h | 3 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 15 min → 2 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Belkin SoundForm Mini 2 WirelessvsPhilips Century TAH2000
vsLazerbuilt Squishmallows Plush Bluetooth HeadphonesvsBelkin SoundForm Mini 2 Wirelessvs
Belkin SoundForm Mini 2 WirelessvsBaseus Bass BH1 NC Wireless ANCvs
Belkin SoundForm Mini 2 WirelessvsFiiO Snowsky Wind
vs
Philips TAK2000vsUgreen HiTune S3 WS209vsPhilips Century TAH2000vsUgreen HiTune S3 WS209