Why is TE-Q3-NA2 better than TW-E3C?
- Active noise cancellingYes · TW-E3C: No
- Battery life11.5 h vs 9 h+28%
- Total with charging case42 h vs 24 h+75%
- Driver size10 mm vs 6 mm+67%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
- Earbud weight (each)4.2 g vs 5 g+19%
Why is TW-E3C better than TE-Q3-NA2?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · TE-Q3-NA2: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- aptXNo · TE-Q3-NA2: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 11.5 h | 9 h |
| Total with charging case | 42 h | 24 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.2 g | 5 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
