How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. EAH-AZ40M2 vs TW-E3C

Technics EAH-AZ40M2 vs Yamaha TW-E3C

What EAH-AZ40M2 does better (3) and where TW-E3C wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Technics EAH-AZ40M2
Technics · 2023EAH-AZ40M2
6.0Score
3 advantages≈ $80
vs
Yamaha TW-E3C
Yamaha · 2023TW-E3C
6.2Score
3 advantages≈ $85
Higher score
7.2Noise control & calls4.6
3.7Battery5.4
4.8Build & features8.1

Why is EAH-AZ40M2 better than TW-E3C?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · TW-E3C: No
  2. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
  3. LDACYes · TW-E3C: No

Why is TW-E3C better than EAH-AZ40M2?

  1. Battery life7 h vs 9 h+29%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
  3. aptXNo · EAH-AZ40M2: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Yamaha TW-E3CYamaha TW-E3C≈ $856.2
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size6 mm6 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life7 h9 h
Battery life with ANC5 h—
Total with charging case24 h24 h
Charging time2 h2 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.2
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCaptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXNoYes
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantAlexaGoogle Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)5 g5 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare