How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530 vs TW-E3C

Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530 vs Yamaha TW-E3C

What Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530 does better (3) and where TW-E3C wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530
Samsung · 2023Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530
5.9Score
3 advantages≈ $100
vs
Yamaha TW-E3C
Yamaha · 2023TW-E3C
6.3Score
3 advantages≈ $85
Higher score
7.2Noise control & calls4.8
3.7Battery5.5

Why is Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530 better than TW-E3C?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · TW-E3C: No
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx5+40%
  3. Total with charging case30 h vs 24 h+25%

Why is TW-E3C better than Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530?

  1. Battery life6 h vs 9 h+50%
  2. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530: Yes
  3. aptXNo · Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Yamaha TW-E3CYamaha TW-E3C≈ $856.3
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—6 mm
Number of drivers2—
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Head trackingYes—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life6 h9 h
Battery life with ANC5 h—
Total with charging case30 h24 h
Charging time—2 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.2
Bluetooth codecsLC3, AAC, SBCaptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoYes
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE AudioYes—
USB-C—Yes
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle AssistantGoogle Assistant, Siri
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)—5 g
Protection ratingIP57IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx5
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare