Why is ATH-WP900 better than M-200 ANC?
- Weight243 g vs 320 g+32%
- Driver size53 mm vs 40 mm+32%
- Highest frequency50,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+25%
Why is M-200 ANC better than ATH-WP900?
- Active noise cancellingNo · ATH-WP900: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | Over-ear |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 53 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 50,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 38 Ω | 30 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | 101 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 20 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | aptX HD, AAC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant |
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 243 g | 320 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
