Why is ATH-WP900 better than NDH-30?
- Weight243 g vs 352 g+45%
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 12 Hz2.4×
- Highest frequency50,000 Hz vs 34,000 Hz+47%
- Driver size53 mm vs 38 mm+39%
Why is NDH-30 better than ATH-WP900?
NDH-30 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Open-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 53 mm | 38 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 1 |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 12 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 50,000 Hz | 34,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 38 Ω | 120 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | 104 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | No |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 243 g | 352 g |
| Colours | Black | Silver |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple AirPods MaxvsAudio Technica ATH-WP900
vs
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay HXvsAudio Technica ATH-WP900
vs
Bang & Olufsen BeoPlay H95vsAudio Technica ATH-WP900
vs
Audio Technica ATH-WP900vsbeyerdynamic T1 (3rd Gen)
vs
Audio Technica ATH-WP900vsbeyerdynamic T5 (3rd Gen)
vs
Audio Technica ATH-WP900vsHifiMan HE-R10 Dynamic Version

