Why is Hi-X65 better than M-200 ANC?
- Weight310 g vs 320 g+3%
Why is M-200 ANC better than Hi-X65?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Hi-X65: Yes
- Highest frequency28,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 28,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 25 Ω | 30 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 110 dB | 101 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 20 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | aptX HD, AAC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant |
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 310 g | 320 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
