vs
Why is ATH-WP900 better than HE-R10 Dynamic Version?
- Weight243 g vs 337 g+39%
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 10 Hz2×
- Highest frequency50,000 Hz vs 35,000 Hz+43%
- Driver size53 mm vs 50 mm+6%
Why is HE-R10 Dynamic Version better than ATH-WP900?
HE-R10 Dynamic Version has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | — |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 53 mm | 50 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 10 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 50,000 Hz | 35,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 38 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | 100 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 10 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 243 g | 337 g |
| Colours | Black | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple AirPods MaxvsAudio Technica ATH-WP900
vsBang & Olufsen Beoplay HXvsAudio Technica ATH-WP900vs
Audio Technica ATH-WP900vsMeze 109 Pro
vsBang & Olufsen BeoPlay H95vsAudio Technica ATH-WP900vs
Apple AirPods MaxvsHifiMan HE-R10 Dynamic VersionvsBang & Olufsen Beoplay HXvsHifiMan HE-R10 Dynamic Version