How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. ATH-WP900 vs BATHYS

Audio Technica ATH-WP900 vs Focal BATHYS

What ATH-WP900 does better (4) and where BATHYS wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Audio Technica ATH-WP900
Audio Technica · 2021ATH-WP900
4 advantages≈ $650
vs
Focal BATHYS
Focal · 2023BATHYS
7.0Score
1 advantage≈ $810
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls6.4

Why is ATH-WP900 better than BATHYS?

  1. Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 15 Hz3×
  2. Weight243 g vs 350 g+44%
  3. Highest frequency50,000 Hz vs 22,100 Hz2.3×
  4. Driver size53 mm vs 40 mm+32%

Why is BATHYS better than ATH-WP900?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · ATH-WP900: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Focal BATHYSFocal BATHYS≈ $8107.0
Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size53 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency5 Hz15 Hz
Highest frequency50,000 Hz22,100 Hz
Impedance38 Ω—
Sensitivity100 dB—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Adaptive ANC—Yes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—35 h
Battery life with ANC—30 h
Charging time—1 h
Quick charge (claimed)—15 min → 5 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessNoYes
Bluetooth version—5.1
Bluetooth codecs—aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—Yes
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Alexa, Google Assistant
Design & build
Weight243 g350 g
Foldable—Yes
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare