vs
3.8Noise control & calls5.8
Why is ATH-WP900 better than BeoPlay H95?
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
- Highest frequency50,000 Hz vs 22,000 Hz2.3×
- Weight243 g vs 323 g+33%
- Driver size53 mm vs 40 mm+32%
Why is BeoPlay H95 better than ATH-WP900?
- Active noise cancellingNo · ATH-WP900: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 53 mm | 40 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 1 |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 50,000 Hz | 22,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 38 Ω | 12 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | 102 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 50 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 38 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,110 mAh |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 243 g | 323 g |
| Protection rating | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
