3.8Noise control & calls3.8
Why is ATH-WP900 better than T5 (3rd Gen)?
- Weight243 g vs 350 g+44%
Why is T5 (3rd Gen) better than ATH-WP900?
T5 (3rd Gen) has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 53 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 50,000 Hz | 50,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 38 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | 128 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | No |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 243 g | 350 g |
| Colours | Black | Black |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple AirPods MaxvsAudio Technica ATH-WP900
vs
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay HXvsAudio Technica ATH-WP900
vs
Audio Technica ATH-WP900vsMeze 109 Pro
vs
Bang & Olufsen BeoPlay H95vsAudio Technica ATH-WP900
vs
Audio Technica ATH-WP900vsHifiMan HE-R10 Dynamic Version
vs
Bang & Olufsen BeoPlay H95vsbeyerdynamic T5 (3rd Gen)
