vs
7.2Noise control & calls3.1
Why is ATH-SQ1TW2NC better than ClipBuds Pro 2?
- Active noise cancellingYes · ClipBuds Pro 2: No
Why is ClipBuds Pro 2 better than ATH-SQ1TW2NC?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · ATH-SQ1TW2NC: Yes
- LDACNo · ATH-SQ1TW2NC: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Open-ear |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 98 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7.5 h | — |
| Battery life with ANC | 6 h | — |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | — |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | LDAC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IP56 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx6 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Colours | — | Silver |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NCvsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörervs
Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NCvsSoundcore R50i NCvs
Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NCvsradius Hear-scape HP-H300BTvs
Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NCvsEdifier W260NC8.28.1
vs
Soundcore AeroFit 2 AIvsUgreen ClipBuds Pro 2vs
Ugreen ClipBuds Pro 2vsMotorola moto buds 2 plus