vs
7.2Noise control & calls3.1
Why is ATH-SQ1TW2NC better than Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer?
- Active noise cancellingYes · Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer: No
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer better than ATH-SQ1TW2NC?
- Battery life7.5 h vs 30 h4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 98 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7.5 h | 30 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 6 h | — |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | — |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Colours | — | Grey, White |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NCvsSoundcore R50i NCvs
Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NCvsradius Hear-scape HP-H300BTvs
Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NCvsEdifier W260NC8.28.1
vs
Apple AirPods 5vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer
vsHuawei FreeClip 2vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer
vsBose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer