vs
7.2Noise control & calls5.6
4.5Battery9.5
Why is ATH-SQ1TW2NC better than Enco Air5 Pro?
ATH-SQ1TW2NC has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Enco Air5 Pro better than ATH-SQ1TW2NC?
- Battery life7.5 h vs 13 h+73%
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · ATH-SQ1TW2NC: Yes
- Driver size5.8 mm vs 12 mm2.1×
- Battery life with ANC6 h vs 7 h+17%
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 6+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 31 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 98 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Microphones | — | 3 |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7.5 h | 13 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 6 h | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 54 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 440 mAh |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | — |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | LHDC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Soundcore Liberty BudsvsAudio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NC8.18.1
vsRealme Buds Air 8 ProvsAudio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NC8.28.1vs
Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NCvsSoundcore AeroFit 2 AI Assistant8.18.1vs
Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NCvsBaseus Bowie MC2
vs
OPPO Enco Air5 ProvsSoundcore P42i9.59.4vsOPPO Enco Air5 ProvsBaseus Bowie MC2