vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
4.6Battery6.5
9.2Build & features6.5
Why is ATH-SQ1TW2NC better than HA-A30T3?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
Why is HA-A30T3 better than ATH-SQ1TW2NC?
- Battery life7.5 h vs 9 h+20%
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 6+15%
- Driver size5.8 mm vs 10 mm+72%
- Charging time2.5 h vs 2 h+25%
- Earbud weight (each)4 g vs 3.9 g+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 98 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7.5 h | 9 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 6 h | — |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 2 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4 g | 3.9 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NCvsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörervs
Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NCvsSoundcore R50i NCvs
Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NCvsradius Hear-scape HP-H300BTvs
Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NCvsEdifier W260NC8.28.1
vs
EarFun Clip 2vsJVC HA-A30T37.57.3vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-OhrhörervsJVC HA-A30T3