vs
3.8Noise control & calls6.9
5.6Battery6.9
Why is ATH-M50xBT2 better than EAH-A800?
- aptXYes · EAH-A800: No
- Driver size45 mm vs 40 mm+12%
Why is EAH-A800 better than ATH-M50xBT2?
- Active noise cancellingNo · ATH-M50xBT2: Yes
- Battery life50 h vs 60 h+20%
- Lowest frequency15 Hz vs 4 Hz3.8×
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
- Weight307 g vs 298 g+3%
- Highest frequency28,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+43%
- Charging time3.5 h vs 3 h+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 45 mm | 40 mm |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 15 Hz | 4 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 28,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 38 Ω | 34 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 99 dB | 105 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 50 h | 60 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 50 h |
| Charging time | 3.5 h | 3 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 10 min → 3 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, aptX, AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | Yes | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 307 g | 298 g |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Audio Technica ATH-M50xBT2vsAustrian Audio Hi-X25BT
vsbeyerdynamic DT 990 PRO Black EditionvsAudio Technica ATH-M50xBT2vs
Audio Technica ATH-M50xBT2vsAudio Technica ATH-EP1000IRvs
Audio Technica ATH-M50xBT2vsGrado SR125xvs
Audio Technica ATH-M50xBT2vsAiaiai TMA-2 Studio
vs
Sennheiser Momentum 4 WirelessvsTechnics EAH-A8008.68.2