vs
2.0Battery5.6
Why is ATH-EP1000IR better than ATH-M50xBT2?
- Weight246 g vs 307 g+25%
Why is ATH-M50xBT2 better than ATH-EP1000IR?
- Battery life5 h vs 50 h10×
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 28,000 Hz+40%
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 15 Hz+33%
- Charging time4 h vs 3.5 h+14%
- Driver size40 mm vs 45 mm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 45 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 1 |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 15 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 28,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 46 Ω | 38 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 97 dB | 99 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5 h | 50 h |
| Charging time | 4 h | 3.5 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 10 min → 3 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 246 g | 307 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Austrian Audio Hi-X25BTvsAudio Technica ATH-EP1000IR
vsbeyerdynamic DT 990 PRO Black EditionvsAudio Technica ATH-EP1000IR
vsTeufel REAL Blue 2021vsAudio Technica ATH-EP1000IRvs
Audio Technica ATH-EP1000IRvsGrado SR125x
vsAudio Technica ATH-M50xBT2vsAustrian Audio Hi-X25BTvsbeyerdynamic DT 990 PRO Black EditionvsAudio Technica ATH-M50xBT2