vs
3.8Noise control & calls3.8
Why is ATH-M50xBT2 better than Hi-X25BT?
- Battery life50 h vs 30 h+67%
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Hi-X25BT: No
- aptXYes · Hi-X25BT: No
- LDACYes · Hi-X25BT: No
- Highest frequency28,000 Hz vs 24,000 Hz+17%
- Driver size45 mm vs 44 mm+2%
Why is Hi-X25BT better than ATH-M50xBT2?
- Weight307 g vs 270 g+14%
- Lowest frequency15 Hz vs 12 Hz+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 45 mm | 44 mm |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 15 Hz | 12 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 28,000 Hz | 24,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 38 Ω | 25 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 99 dB | 113 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 50 h | 30 h |
| Charging time | 3.5 h | — |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 10 min → 3 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, aptX, AAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 307 g | 270 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO Black EditionvsAudio Technica ATH-M50xBT2vs
Audio Technica ATH-M50xBT2vsAudio Technica ATH-EP1000IRvs
Audio Technica ATH-M50xBT2vsGrado SR125xvs
Audio Technica ATH-M50xBT2vsAiaiai TMA-2 Studio
vsAustrian Audio Hi-X25BTvsAudio Technica ATH-EP1000IRvsbeyerdynamic DT 990 PRO Black EditionvsAustrian Audio Hi-X25BT