vs
3.1Battery6.2
2.0Build & features2.7
Why is ATH-ANC300TW better than WF-XB700?
- Charging time1 h vs 2.5 h2.5×
- aptXYes · WF-XB700: No
- Earbud weight (each)7 g vs 8 g+14%
Why is WF-XB700 better than ATH-ANC300TW?
- Battery life4.5 h vs 9 h2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx42×
- Driver size5.8 mm vs 12 mm2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 25,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 14 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 106 dB | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 4.5 h | 9 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | 2.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 7 g | 8 g |
| Protection rating | IPX2 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
