vs
4.0Noise control & calls4.0
Why is LCD-2 Classic Closed Back MAZE better than ATH-WP900?
- Driver size106 mm vs 53 mm2×
Why is ATH-WP900 better than LCD-2 Classic Closed Back MAZE?
- Weight612 g vs 243 g2.5×
- Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 5 Hz2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | On-ear |
| Driver size | 106 mm | 53 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 50,000 Hz | 50,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 70 Ω | 38 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 97 dB | 100 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 612 g | 243 g |
| Colours | Black | Black |
Related comparisons
vs
Focal Clear MG ProfessionalvsAudeze LCD-2 Classic Closed Back MAZE
vs
T+A Solitaire TvsAudeze LCD-2 Classic Closed Back MAZE
vs
Apple AirPods MaxvsAudio Technica ATH-WP900
vs
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay HXvsAudio Technica ATH-WP900
vs
Audio Technica ATH-WP900vsV-MODA M-200 ANC
vs
Audio Technica ATH-WP900vsNeumann NDH-30
