vs
9.2Noise control & calls6.4
4.9Battery7.5
Why is TMA-2 Studio Wireless better than Aventho 200?
- Weight227 g vs 293 g+29%
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 22,000 Hz+82%
Why is Aventho 200 better than TMA-2 Studio Wireless?
- Battery life40 h vs 63 h+57%
- Charging time3 h vs 1.5 h2×
- Driver size40 mm vs 45 mm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 45 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 10 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 22,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 111 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 40 h | 63 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 40 h |
| Charging time | 3 h | 1.5 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 227 g | 293 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra (2nd Gen)vsAiaiai TMA-2 Studio Wireless7.57.5vs
Aiaiai TMA-2 Studio WirelessvsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Goldvs
Aiaiai TMA-2 Studio WirelessvsAudio Technica ATH-R70xa
vsFiiO FT13vsAiaiai TMA-2 Studio Wireless
vs
JBL Tour One M3vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 2007.98.5vs
beyerdynamic Aventho 200vsJBL TOUR ONE M3 SMART TX8.57.9