vs
9.2Noise control & calls3.8
Why is TMA-2 Studio Wireless better than 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold?
- Active noise cancellingYes · 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold: No
- Weight227 g vs 260 g+15%
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 25,000 Hz+60%
- Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 15 Hz+50%
Why is 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold better than TMA-2 Studio Wireless?
99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 15 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 25,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 111 dB | 103 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 40 h | — |
| Charging time | 3 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 227 g | 260 g |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra (2nd Gen)vsAiaiai TMA-2 Studio Wireless7.57.5vs
Aiaiai TMA-2 Studio WirelessvsAudio Technica ATH-R70xa
vsFiiO FT13vsAiaiai TMA-2 Studio Wirelessvs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra (2nd Gen)vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold
vsSony WH-1000XM6vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold
vsJBL Tour One M3vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold