How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. NiceComfort 35 vs M-1

Srhythm NiceComfort 35 vs Teenage Engineering M-1

What NiceComfort 35 does better (2) and where M-1 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Srhythm NiceComfort 35
Srhythm · 2020NiceComfort 35
8.1Score
2 advantages≈ $60
Higher score
vs
Teenage Engineering M-1
Teenage Engineering · 2021M-1
0 advantages≈ $75
9.2Noise control & calls4.0

Why is NiceComfort 35 better than M-1?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · M-1: No
  2. Charging time2 h vs 4 h2×

Why is M-1 better than NiceComfort 35?

M-1 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity—100 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Battery & charging
Battery life50 h—
Battery life with ANC30 h—
Battery capacity800 mAh—
Charging time2 h4 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 3 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesNo
Bluetooth version5—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight180 g—
Protection ratingIPX4—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
Foldable—Yes
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare