Why is LH500XW better than M-1?
- Active noise cancellingYes · M-1: No
Why is M-1 better than LH500XW?
M-1 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 15 h | — |
| Battery life with ANC | 12 h | — |
| Charging time | — | 4 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth version | 4.1 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
