Why is WH-XB910N better than EAH-A800?
- Weight252 g vs 298 g+18%
Why is EAH-A800 better than WH-XB910N?
- Battery life50 h vs 60 h+20%
- Lowest frequency7 Hz vs 4 Hz+75%
- Highest frequency25,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+60%
- Charging time3.5 h vs 3 h+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 7 Hz | 4 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 25,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 34 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 105 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 50 h | 60 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 50 h |
| Charging time | 3.5 h | 3 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 252 g | 298 g |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
