Why is SR125x better than WH-XB910N?
- Weight160 g vs 252 g+57%
Why is WH-XB910N better than SR125x?
- Active noise cancellingNo · SR125x: Yes
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 7 Hz2.9×
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 25,000 Hz+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | — |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 7 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 25,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 38 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 99 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 50 h |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 160 g | 252 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
